After fifteen years in SaaS, I’ve reached a stage where I can predict the moment a company’s lead generation system will fail. It’s usually right after someone proudly tells me they’re “running the classic funnel,” as if the internet didn’t change, buyers didn’t evolve, and competitors didn’t multiply tenfold.
A lot of teams still cling to a playbook that had its moment a decade ago. Back when cold email wasn’t abused, social channels weren’t overrun, and every blog post didn’t sound like it had been written in one breath. The frustrating part is that many SaaS companies don’t even realize they’re following an outdated rhythm. They feel the drop in demo requests, they sense buyers becoming harder to reach, but they still repeat the same routine — louder, not smarter.
What follows isn’t theory. It’s the version of lead generation I kept coming back to after every experiment, every plateau, every “let’s burn everything down and start again” moment. It works because it matches how people actually buy now, not how marketers wish they behaved.
One of the first signs of trouble is when a team hands me a “persona document” the size of a novella, describing fictional people in painful detail. I’ve never met a lead who bought software because they “prefer oat milk” or “read Forbes on weekends.”
What I want to know is how they make decisions, what breaks their day, what budgets they touch, and how they think about change. Every time a SaaS company resets its ICP around real behavior — actual patterns, real conversations, real objections — the entire strategy suddenly feels lighter. Content becomes easier to write. Outreach stops sounding robotic. The product team finally gets clarity. And marketing isn’t guessing anymore.
The old persona method belongs to the era when teams tried to impress investors with decks, not customers with relevance.
Funnels look nice in presentations. Real life, not so much. People don’t move step by step anymore. They jump. They pause. They Google you. They ask someone they trust. They read something you forgot you even posted. They join a Slack community. They come back months later because of a random comment you wrote under someone else’s thread.
For years, I believed that if you just “optimized the funnel,” leads would flow. Then reality slapped me. Hard. The biggest deals I ever closed came through side doors — introductions, partners, existing users, small communities, events that weren’t even meant for selling.
SaaS grows faster when you treat your brand like part of a neighborhood, not a loud billboard.
The moment “thought leadership” became a trending term, the whole concept got diluted. Now everyone wants to be a thought leader, but no one wants to have a thought.
The posts that move leads are rarely the polished ones. They’re the messy, honest, scarred-by-experience ones. The ones where you admit something didn’t work. The ones where you take a stance instead of summarizing what every other blog already said.
I’ve had founders tell me they want “viral content.” I tell them to write something useful first.
Buyers follow confidence, clarity, and candor. Not 2,000-word SEO fluff dressed up as expertise.
Social selling has so much potential, yet most SaaS teams treat it like a vending machine — push a message in, wait for a lead to fall out.
That’s how the platform becomes polluted with “quick question” DMs that are neither quick nor questions. The truth? I’ve never seen social selling work for people who show up only when they want something.
The people who win are the ones you see often — not aggressively, just consistently. They comment thoughtfully. They don’t drop links like confetti. They write about real problems instead of product updates disguised as storytelling. When they finally DM someone, it feels natural, not forced.
The magic isn’t in posting more. It’s in being someone people don’t mind hearing from.
Cold outreach still works. I know because I’ve sat on both sides of it. It just doesn’t work the way it used to — volume first, personalization second, intelligence nowhere.
After so many years, I’ve grown allergic to sequences that try to “warm me up” through six painfully similar emails. I ignore messages that try to mimic personal tone but clearly use a template. And I delete emails that tell me about my own company in a way that proves the sender spent eight seconds researching.
Great outreach feels like it was written for one person, not “inserted” for one. It doesn’t overexplain. It doesn’t brag. It gets to the point.
The funny thing is: when outreach is this direct and intelligent, you don’t need to do much of it.
Most underperforming lead-gen systems have one thing in common: they follow a rhythm that ignores timing. Everyone gets nurtured the same way, approached the same way, qualified the same way — as if every buyer wakes up with identical urgency.
When you start paying attention to intent signals, everything tightens. Not the creepy kind of tracking — the obvious stuff. Someone reading your pricing page twice. Someone replaying your product video. Someone returning to a problem-led blog post. Someone comparing you to a competitor.
Modern lead generation is basically pattern recognition. You’re not trying to convince everyone. You’re trying to reach the right person at the moment they are already thinking about their problem.
That shift alone saves teams months of wasted activity.
Content in SaaS is often treated like a diet plan: consistency over depth. So teams publish constantly, hoping volume will save them. It doesn’t.
The pieces that actually move people tend to be opinionated, tactical, or a small glimpse into something real. Sometimes a screenshot with context does more than a 3,000-word guide. Sometimes a single paragraph explaining how a customer solved a problem beats a polished case study.
If your content sounds like it could appear on any other SaaS blog, it will not generate meaningful leads. Content needs texture — a specific angle, a distinct voice, a real point.
When done right, content acts like gravity. People come to you even when you’re not actively pushing.
In every niche, there are small pockets of trust — private groups, Slack channels, Discord communities, niche newsletters, specialized training programs, even DMs between operators who know each other. This is where the most valuable lead generation happens now.
You see it clearly in categories like nonprofit software, where most buying decisions start inside tight-knit groups — operators talk, recommend tools they trust, and rely far more on peer validation than on traditional funnels.
Someone mentions you once. Someone shares your post. Someone links to your tool in a casual chat. Someone forwards a case study that resonated.
None of this shows up in attribution dashboards, but that’s where the real pipelines originate.
I’ve watched tiny SaaS brands break into enterprise deals simply because a specific group started talking about them. SaaS isn’t won through volume anymore. It’s won through credibility inside the right circles.
Most SaaS companies don’t have a lead generation problem. They have a relevance problem.
Their messaging is safe.
Their content is forgettable.
Their outreach sounds automated.
Their social presence is invisible.
Their ICP is outdated.
Their timing is random.
Their brand lives outside the communities buyers actually trust.
I’ve built strategies for teams that blamed the market, the economy, the competition… and within weeks, their pipeline woke up simply because we modernized how they show up.
Lead generation in SaaS is just not compatible with the old rhythm.
The companies that win today approach it like a craft, not a checklist.
Lead generation becomes easier — even enjoyable — when you stop trying to do more and start doing what actually connects with how people buy.
Find out if MentorCruise is a good fit for you – fast, free, and no pressure.
Tell us about your goals
See how mentorship compares to other options
Preview your first month
