In our previous discussion on Customer Experience: The Reliability Metric That Matters, we highlighted how consistent, reliable services directly impact customer trust. Reliability is not just a technical target; it is a shared commitment across product, engineering, and business teams. Turning this commitment into daily practice demands thoughtful strategies, especially around incident management and production readiness.
Navigating reliability models: SRE vs. "You Build It, You Own It"
Two leading models define how organizations approach reliability and incident response: Google's SRE model and the "You Build It, You Own It" philosophy.
Google's SRE model introduces a structured hand-off where development teams must present operational evidence—logs, metrics, and service-level objectives (SLOs)—to prove production readiness. Production Readiness Reviews (PRRs) are integral, ensuring services meet high operational standards. This process promotes collaboration while holding teams accountable for delivering stable services.
In contrast, the "You Build It, You Own It" model gives development teams complete responsibility, from coding to deployment and incident response. Dev teams are on-call for their services, gaining firsthand insight into the real-world impact of their decisions. SREs, in this case, focus on platform reliability, offering tools and guidance without owning production support. This fosters agility and rapid innovation but comes with risks like burnout, operational gaps, and compromises between speed and stability.
Understanding the challenges
SRE model challenges:
- Deployment Delays: PRR dependencies can create bottlenecks if the SRE team is overburdened.
- Developer Disconnect: Developers may lose sight of operational realities, risking less supportable designs.
- Scaling Constraints: Growing the SRE team to cover diverse services can become resource-intensive.
"You Build It, You Own It" challenges:
- On-Call Stress: Balancing development with on-call duties can lead to burnout.
- Operational Gaps: Developers may lack the depth of expertise to resolve complex incidents swiftly.
- Speed vs. Stability: Pressure for rapid feature delivery may compromise service reliability.
Bridging the gap: operational alignment and incident command
A crucial bridge between these models is ensuring continuous alignment between development and operations teams. Embedding operational feedback loops, such as regular reliability reviews and shared post-incident analyses, allows teams to refine their practices. Establishing clear incident command structures ensures that, while AI-driven tools automate detection and resolution, human expertise remains central to managing complex, high-impact incidents.
For example, senior SREs can lead critical incidents while development teams handle less severe issues, supported by automated escalation paths and real-time data insights. This balance prevents burnout and ensures consistent, efficient incident responses across all severity levels.
Rethinking production readiness in the AI era
As AI agents evolve, production readiness must keep pace. Traditional checks struggle to capture the complexity of AI systems. Integrating real-time data across various sources can generate a live production readiness score, offering an accurate snapshot of system health and risk. An adaptive readiness score could empower teams to make smarter deployment decisions and respond swiftly to new risks.
AI also could strengthen monitoring by recognizing early patterns that precede incidents. Predictive insights and automated anomaly detection could give to the teams the ability to address issues before they escalate, making responses more proactive and precise.
Smarter, Faster Responses
AI is transforming incident management by driving faster, more intelligent responses. Automation detects anomalies, evaluates impact, and can trigger pre-set responses, reducing human intervention for routine issues. AI potentially will enhance readiness by automating anomaly detection, predicting failures, and enabling smarter incident responses. It could prioritize incidents by analyzing user impact, severity, and historical trends.
Predictive analytics further anticipates system failures by identifying patterns in historical data, allowing teams to intervene early. AI agents can assist in triage, guiding developers with immediate solutions and relevant documentation, shortening resolution times.
Selecting the right approach for your team
Choosing between the SRE model and "You Build It, You Own It" depends on your company’s scale, complexity, and operational culture.
Large Enterprises often favor the SRE model for its structured processes like PRRs and SLOs, which bring consistency across numerous services. However, scaling the SRE team to support diverse services can become a challenge.
Smaller, Agile Teams may lean toward "You Build It, You Own It," as it fosters speed, autonomy, and close feedback loops. While this approach enables rapid iteration, it can lead to burnout or gaps in operational expertise when incidents arise.
Hybrid Models combine the strengths of both: developers own their services end-to-end, while SREs provide shared tools, best practices, and platform reliability. This balance supports agility without compromising stability.
Ultimately, your choice depends on your scale, team expertise, and whether your priority is rapid iteration or long-term reliability. No model is one-size-fits-all—adapt to what works best for your team now and evolve as you grow.
Looking ahead: Decision-making in the AI future
With the rapid rise of AI, microservices, and expansive infrastructure, reliability must evolve. Structured SRE practices and full-service ownership are both pathways to delivering dependable services, but the focus should always be on building trust with customers.
The future of reliability will revolve around three key decision-making models:
- Assisted Decisions: AI provides insights and recommendations, but humans make the final call. This model is ideal for complex issues requiring judgment and experience.
- Augmented Decisions: AI collaborates with human teams in real-time, combining data analysis with operational expertise to co-drive incident response and system improvements.
- Automated Decisions: AI independently detects, diagnoses, and resolves routine or predictable issues, freeing human teams to focus on higher-value tasks.
By strategically leveraging live production readiness scoring, AI-powered incident response, and adaptive deployment practices across these decision models, organisations could make confident decisions and create resilient, high-performing systems.
Don’t miss my presentation Chaos Carnival 2025 on January 22nd about “Empowering SRE teams and Incident management with AI”. Save the date and register here: https://bit.ly/4h9kjGb
Follow me on
Contact me!
- I advise startups, coach leaders and help in lots of ways. Contact me.