40 Testing Interview Questions

Are you prepared for questions like 'Describe the software development life cycle (SDLC)' and similar? We've collected 40 interview questions for you to prepare for your next Testing interview.

Did you know? We have over 3,000 mentors available right now!

Describe the software development life cycle (SDLC)

The Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is a systematic process for building software that ensures its quality and correctness. It consists of a detailed plan describing how to develop, maintain, replace, and enhance specific software.

The process typically starts with planning where requirements and goals are defined. Followed by the design phase where the system and software design documents are prepared according to the requirement specification. The third phase involves implementation and coding where the actual coding happens, bringing the design to life.

After that, we have testing where software is tested for defects and discrepancies. Once the product is ready, it goes through deployment where the product is put into the market for users. Lastly, we have the maintenance phase which occurs post-deployment where timely updates and changes are made to the software based on user feedback.

Testing, as a standalone process, is part of the larger SDLC, and it plays a critical role in ensuring that the final product is ready for deployment with the least possible issues.

What is the role of the test management tool in testing?

A test management tool plays a crucial role in organizing and managing the testing processes in software development. It provides a structured environment for the testing team to carry out tasks such as test planning, test case creation, test execution and reporting.

The tool can create a central repository for information, making it easier to track the progress of individual tests, manage test artifacts, and maintain documentation. It can also help to map requirements to specific tests, ensuring that all necessary functionality is adequately covered in the testing process.

Moreover, with features for automation, integration and collaboration, a test management tool can increase efficiency, improve communication and collaboration between team members, and reduce errors, making the testing process smoother and more productive.

What is user acceptance testing (UAT) and why is it important?

User Acceptance Testing (UAT) is the final phase in the testing process, where the end users test the software to make sure it can handle required tasks in real-world scenarios, according to specifications. It's also known as end-user testing, as it's conducted by the actual users who will be using the software in their environment.

UAT is essential because it helps ascertain if the software is ready for deployment. It gives confidence to both the team and the client that the software is functioning as expected, meeting all requirements and user expectations. By performing UAT, the risk of discovering a fatal issue after deployment is greatly reduced. This testing phase is the last opportunity for users to validate all the functionalities before the software gets released in the market.

Can you explain the difference between functional and non-functional testing?

Functional testing is a type of software testing that evaluates the performance of individual functions of a software application. It's focused on the results - basically, it checks if the system does what it is supposed to do. Input is given and the output is assessed to ensure it matches expectations based on requirement specifications.

Non-functional testing, on the other hand, is not about whether the system works, but how well it works. It tests aspects such as usability, reliability, performance, and scalability. It's about how the system behaves under certain circumstances, like heavy loads or network failure. It also checks system security and ensures the software application performs well under stress.

How would you explain black-box testing?

Black-box testing is a method of software testing where the functionality of an application is examined without the tester having any knowledge of the internal workings of the item being tested. The focus here is on inputs and expected outputs without concerning how and where the inputs are operated within the system.

For example, consider an email application. A black-box tester would provide an input, like clicking the send button without attaching a file indicated to attach, and observe the output. If an appropriate error message is displayed, the test passes. If not, it fails. In this case, the tester doesn’t need to know how the code processes the send instruction. They're essentially looking at the software like a "Black Box," where inputs go in and outputs come out, but what happens inside is unknown or irrelevant to the test.

What is white-box testing?

White-box testing, contrary to black-box testing, is a software testing technique where the internal operations of a program are examined. The tester has a comprehensive understanding of the code, how it works, its logic, structure, and design. This testing method is primarily concerned with the internal paths, code structures, conditions, loops, and the overall architecture of the system.

Aside from checking for expected outcomes, white-box testing is also involved with checking internal subroutines, internal data structures, and other intricate workings of the software. An example could be a unit test where a specific function of the code is tested to ensure it works properly under different scenarios. For white-box testing, a degree of programming knowledge is essential as the tester must be able to understand the code and trace the logic underlying it.

What is regression testing and when is it applicable?

Regression testing is a type of software testing that ensures that previously developed and tested software functions correctly after changes such as enhancements, patches, or configuration modifications have been made. Its goal is to confirm that the recent changes haven't disturbed any of the existing functionalities or caused any new bugs.

You tend to apply regression testing after a new code integration to ensure everything still works as expected. It's also applicable whenever software maintenance is performed due to changes in requirements or design, or as part of bug fixing. So, in other words, any time software modification occurs, regression testing should be carried out to certify existing functionality remains unaffected.

How do you classify bugs in testing?

Bugs in testing are typically classified based on a few criteria: severity, priority, and status. Severity refers to how much a defect is impacting the functionality of the product. It could be low if the impact is minor, medium if it moderately affects the software operations, and high if the bug is causing the system to crash or lose data.

Priority, on the other hand, decides how soon the bug should be fixed. For instance, low priority for bugs that don't affect major functionalities and can be delayed, medium priority for bugs that should be resolved in a normal course without impacting the schedule, and high priority for bugs that need to be fixed immediately as they interfere with user experience or system functionality.

Status is used to track the current state of the bug in the debugging process. It could be tagged as new, assigned, in progress, fixed, or reopened. This categorization helps in managing the debugging process efficiently and keeping track of the bug-fixing progress.

What types of documents would you prepare as a part of the testing process?

During the testing process, several documentation types are prepared to ensure thoroughness, traceability, and effective communication. Firstly, a Test Plan outlines the strategy and schedule for testing activities. It defines what will be tested, who will do the testing, and how testing will be done.

Additionally, the creation of Test Cases is crucial. They provide a set of conditions or variables under which a tester will determine whether a system under test fulfills the requirements or works correctly. They're typically based on the requirements specification document.

In the wake of test execution, testers generate a Test Report. It's essentially a record of all testing activities, including both the expected and actual results, discrepancies or bugs, if any, and the conclusion - whether the test case failed or passed.

For bugs and issues found during testing, defect reports or bug reports are prepared that give detailed information about the bug, its nature, its occurrence, and its impact on the software.

Lastly, for improvements and enhancements, a Test Improvement Plan might be prepared which pinpoints areas of inefficiency needing improvement, and lays out a plan on how to achieve those improvements.

Can you explain the difference between manual and automated testing?

Manual testing is a process where testers manually execute test cases and verify the results. This means going through each functionality of the application meticulously to check if it behaves as expected. It's really hands-on, so it needs human judgment and creativity, making it effective for exploratory, usability, and ad-hoc testing.

Automated testing, on the other hand, uses automation tools to execute test cases. Instead of carrying out each test step by step, testers write scripts and use software to perform tests. It's ideal for repeated tests that need to run for different versions of the software, like regression testing. Automation can save a lot of time and effort over time, but it requires initial time and resource investment for writing and maintaining test scripts.

Both methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between them depends largely on the context and the specific needs of the project. Often, they're used in conjunction to balance out their respective strengths and weaknesses.

What is a software defect life cycle?

A software defect life cycle, also known as a bug life cycle, is the journey of a defect from its identification to its closure. The lifecycle begins when a defect is identified and logged. The newly found defect is in an open or 'new' status.

Upon review, if the defect is found valid and can be replicated, it is acknowledged and assigned a status called 'assigned'. It's then assigned to developers or the development team to rectify. Once the issue is fixed, the status changes to 'fixed'.

Then the testing team retests the issue. If the defect no longer exists, it's marked as 'closed'. However, if it still exists, the bug is 'reopened' and sent back to the development team.

Sometimes, if the defect is not a priority and does not affect the functionality of the system, it might be deferred to be fixed in the next releases. In a case where the found issue is as per the system's intended behavior, it may be rejected. Understanding the bug life cycle helps teams manage defects effectively and systematically, ultimately improving the quality of the software.

How do you ensure the quality of your test results?

Ensuring the quality of test results lies in meticulous planning, execution, and review. It starts with creating comprehensive, well-designed test cases that cover all possible scenarios and requirements. The more relevant and well-prepared they are, the more reliable the test results will be.

During the test execution, paying attention to details and keeping thorough documentation also contributes to test result quality. We must check that all steps are followed, record outcomes accurately, and log any discrepancies or bugs properly.

Finally, a review of the results is crucial. The test results should be cross-verified for any inconsistencies. Also, it's important to retest and perform regression testing after a bug has been fixed to ensure that the solution works as expected and hasn't introduced any new issues. Further, frequent communication and collaboration with the entire team can also improve the quality of the test results.

What is load testing and why it is performed?

Load testing is a type of performance testing that checks how a system behaves under a specific load. It simulates a large number of users accessing the server at the same time and measures system response times, throughput rates, and resource utilization levels.

Load testing is typically performed to ensure that the software can handle expected user loads without performance being degraded. It ensures that the system meets the performance criteria set out for it and identifies any weak points, bottlenecks, or capacity limitations in the system. This can offer valuable insights about the scalability of a product and help to identify any necessary infrastructure changes that need to be made before the software’s release. Load testing can prevent performance issues in production that could negatively impact user experience and satisfaction.

What is the difference between alpha and beta testing?

Alpha and Beta Testing are distinct stages in the software development life cycle, both focusing on catching bugs before release, but they involve different sets of users and occur at different points in the cycle.

Alpha testing is undertaken by internal teams (developers and testers) after the software development is complete but not ready for release yet. It’s primarily focused on spotting bugs and issues that couldn’t be identified during the development phase. Each feature is thoroughly tested, often using white box techniques, to ensure it behaves as expected.

Beta testing, on the other hand, is conducted after alpha testing has concluded and any identified issues have been fixed. In this stage, a limited group of end-users outside the organization gets to test the product in a real-world environment. Their feedback helps uncover real-world usability issues, understand user expectations better and make any necessary adjustments before the final release. As such, beta testing is often more about user experience and less about finding latent bugs.

How do you determine test coverage?

Test coverage, in simple terms, is a metric that helps us understand the amount of testing done by a set of test cases. It essentially tells us how much of the application we are testing. To determine the test coverage, I usually begin by reviewing the software's functional requirements and use cases.

For a given feature or function, I track elements like functional points or user scenarios. I then craft test cases that cover these elements. The ratio of elements that are covered by these test cases to the total elements represents the test coverage. For example, if there are 100 function points to cover and we have written test cases to cover 80 function points then our test coverage is 80%.

One key point is that test coverage isn't just about quantity; it's also about quality. High test coverage doesn't necessarily ensure that the testing is adequate. It's also important to focus on the depth of the testing, not just the breadth. This is why it's essential to regularly review and update test cases to align with the evolving features and functionalities of the software.

Can you provide an example of a time when you utilized smoke testing?

Sure, when I was working on a web application project, every time a new build was released, I performed smoke testing. Basically, the developers would notify the testing team after integrating new code into the existing codebase. My responsibility was to conduct a preliminary assessment to see if the build was stable and ready for further rigorous testing.

I would begin by checking the most crucial features of the application - for instance, the ability to log in, the main navigation functions, form submissions, or any other essential features that the application was supposed to perform. In one instance, I found that after a new update, users were unable to complete the login process due to an unexpected error message.

This issue was critical because if a user couldn't log in, they wouldn't be able to use any of the other functionalities. I immediately reported it back to the development team. This error, detected during smoke testing, meant the build was unstable and saved us considerable time as we avoided further in-depth testing of an unstable build. The developers were able to quickly address the login issue and release a new, more stable build for comprehensive testing.

What is performance testing?

Performance testing is a testing method conducted to determine the speed, responsiveness, and stability of a software application under different levels of workload. It's designed to test the runtime performance of a software under specific loads, often providing insights into speed, reliability, and network data throughput.

It's aimed at identifying performance bottlenecks such as slow response times, data latency, or total system failures that could negatively impact user experience. It helps developers and testers to understand how the application behaves under heavy loads, whether the infrastructure is adequate, and if the application can handle peak user load during peak usage times.

Variations of performance testing include load testing (how the system behaves under expected loads), stress testing (how it behaves under excessive loads), and capacity testing (to identify how many users and/or transactions a system can handle and still perform well).

What testing metrics do you regularly use?

Testing metrics can vary based on project requirements, but a few that I often find myself using are:

  1. Test Case Preparation Status: This measures the progress of test case creation. I track the number of test cases prepared versus how many are left to be created.

  2. Test Case Execution Status: This helps me keep track of how many test cases have been run, which ones have passed, failed, or are blocked.

  3. Defect Density: This is calculated by taking the number of defects divided by the size of the module. It's useful to identify the modules with the highest concentration of defects.

  4. Defect Age: It represents the time from when a defect is introduced to when it's detected. This metric can help identify areas of the software where defects linger for longer periods.

  5. Percentage of Automated Tests: It indicates what percentage of total tests are automated. This helps in determining the effort saved by automation and the scalability of the test process.

Choosing the right metrics depends heavily on the goals and nature of the project, as well as the specific aspects of the testing process you want to monitor or improve.

What are the phases involved in the software testing life cycle (STLC)?

The Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC) describes the series of activities conducted during the testing process to ensure the quality of a software product. It generally consists of six phases:

  1. Requirement Analysis: In this phase, testers go through the software requirement documents to understand what the software should do and plan the testing process accordingly.

  2. Test Planning: Here, the overall testing strategy is developed. The resources, timeframes, testing tools and the responsibilities of each team member are decided.

  3. Test Case Development: This phase involves writing the test cases based on the requirements. Simultaneously, testing data for executing the test cases are also prepared.

  4. Test Environment Setup: It's the stage where the environment required for testing is set up. This includes hardware, software, network configurations etc. The actual testing is executed in this environment.

  5. Test Execution: At this stage, the test cases are run, and any bugs or issues are reported back to the development team.

  6. Test Closure: Once testing is completed, a test closure report is prepared describing the testing activities during the entire testing process. It documents the test results and the findings from the tests.

Each of these phases is essential and plays a pivotal role in ensuring that the software under test meets the required standards and specifications.

When do you consider testing to be complete?

Completeness of testing can be a bit subjective because theoretically, we can continue testing endlessly as there're always corner cases or scenarios which haven't been tested. But in a practical sense, there are certain criteria which if satisfied, can make us reasonably confident that the testing is complete.

First, when all the test cases planned have been executed. Second, if all the critical bugs have been fixed and the remaining bugs are minor or negligible, and won't affect the product's functioning significantly. Third, when the system meets the agreed upon requirements and functions as expected. And lastly, when the testing phase hits its deadline or exhausts its allocated resources.

The ultimate goal is to achieve a state where continuing testing activities will not significantly reduce the overall risk and the software is ready to provide value to users. However, one must remember that even post-release, testing might still be needed for future updates or in response to user feedbacks.

How do you handle conflicts within your testing team?

Dealing with conflicts effectively is an important part of keeping a team functioning optimally. When I encounter a conflict within my team, my first step is always to understand the situation clearly. I aim to have a conversation with the involved parties individually to understand their perspectives and what led to the disagreement.

Once I have clarity on the situation, I arrange a meeting where everyone can communicate their viewpoints in a structured and respectful environment. The intent of this meeting would be to find common ground or a compromise that can resolve the disagreement.

If reaching a consensus isn't possible, as a last resort, we might need to escalate the situation to a higher authority or a mediator to get an unbiased perspective that can facilitate a solution. The main goal is to manage the conflict quickly and constructively, so as not to disrupt the overall progress of the team or the project.

Can you explain component testing with an example?

Component testing, also known as unit or module testing, is a testing approach where individual components of a software application are tested separately to verify that each performs as expected. This typically happens at an early stage of the testing process and is usually done by the developer who built the component.

For example, let's consider a web application for an online store. One component of this web application might be the shopping cart where users add products they wish to purchase.

For component testing, you would isolate the shopping cart function from the rest of the system and test it individually. Test cases might include: adding a single item to the cart, adding multiple items, removing an item, changing the quantity of an item in the cart, checking if the total price updates correctly when items are added or removed, and so on.

The goal of component testing is to ensure that each individual part of the application is working correctly before they are assembled together for integration testing. This can help locate and fix issues early in the development cycle, which improves efficiency and reduces costs.

How have you handled a situation when a defect was not reproducible?

When confronted with a defect that can't be reproduced consistently, the first step is to gather as much information as possible. This includes details of the environment in which the defect was observed, the exact steps taken, the inputs used, and the system state before the issue occurred.

I would then try to replicate the defect in the exact same environment and under the same conditions in which it was first found. Speaking with the person who discovered the defect can provide valuable insights that may not be included in the initial defect report.

If the issue still cannot be reproduced, I would look into variables like network conditions, server load, concurrent operations, timing issues, or data driven aspects that can affect the execution path in unpredictable ways.

If the defect remains non-reproducible, it might be deprioritized based on its impact and the probability of occurrence. However, it's crucial to document everything and keep all stakeholders informed about the situation to ensure a quick response in case the defect re-emerges.

How do you manage your time while testing under a tight deadline?

Time management is crucial when working under a tight deadline. One of my primary approaches is to stay organized and plan ahead. This involves outlining all the tasks that need to be completed, prioritizing them based on deadlines and importance, and then creating a detailed schedule.

It's key to focus initially on the most critical tests, such as testing the main functionalities of the application, which are likely to have the most significant impact on end users. I also apply risk-based testing strategies to ensure that areas of the application with the highest risk get tested thoroughly.

Automation can be a great time-saver for certain repetitive tests that would be too time-consuming to perform manually. It also helps in ensuring consistency.

Lastly, it's important to maintain clear communication lines with the team and stakeholders. Regular updates about the progress and any potential bottlenecks can help manage expectations and assist in getting necessary support or resources to achieve the deadline. Effective time management in testing is all about prioritizing, planning, and using resources efficiently.

How would you handle a situation where you believe a piece of software is not ready to release, but management insists otherwise?

If I believe a software isn't ready for release but management insists otherwise, I would first clearly communicate my concerns, backed with evidence. Whether it be unresolved critical bugs, incomplete features, or failed test cases, I would provide specific examples and data to justify why I think the software is not ready.

I would also highlight the possible repercussions of releasing the software prematurely, such as negative customer feedback, loss of customer trust, potential costs related to hotfixes or patches, and the impact on the company’s reputation.

In some cases, it might be possible to compromise on a partial or phased release or suggest extra resources for fixing critical issues before the release date.

However, the final decision often rests with the management and it's important to respect that decision. My role as a tester is to provide the clearest possible picture of the software's current state and to articulate any potential risks for informed decision-making. Ultimately, whatever the decision, as a professional, I would continue to do my best in ensuring the software's quality.

How do you decide which testing tool to use for a particular test?

The choice of a testing tool depends on several factors tied to the specific test at hand and the context in which it will be executed. Primarily, the tool should be suited to the type of testing needed - whether it's unit testing, integration testing, functional testing, performance testing, or automated testing.

Firstly, understanding the requirements of the test is crucial. If we're doing load testing, we would need a tool that can simulate heavy loads. If we're automating testing, we need an automation tool that supports the programming languages/frameworks used in our application.

Compatibility of the tool with the application's platform and technology stack is also a crucial point to consider. Furthermore, the tool's usability, learning curve, and how well it integrates with existing systems and tools also factor into the decision.

Lastly, other aspects such as the budget, the tool's licensing and support options, and the overall return on investment should also be considered before making a final decision. Exploring different options, participating in trials, reading reviews, and expert opinions can all be beneficial in the final decision process.

What is a test case? How do you create one?

A test case is a set of conditions or variables under which a tester determines whether a system under test meets specifications and works correctly. It includes details about what inputs to use, the steps to follow, the expected results, and the actual results obtained.

Creating a test case involves the following steps:

  1. Identify Test Case ID: Assign a unique identifier to each test case for easy tracking and management.

  2. Understand the Requirements: You need a full understanding of what the system is supposed to achieve based on requirement documents.

  3. Define Prerequisites: These are the preconditions that need to be fulfilled before the test can be executed.

  4. Define Input and Expected Results: The test case should clearly state the inputs and the expected outcome. The outcome could be data related or it could be an application behavior.

  5. Explain Test Procedure: Describe step-by-step how to navigate through the system to perform the test.

  6. Execute Test and Record Results: Run the test case, record the results, and compare them against expected outcomes.

  7. Update Test Case: If needed, revise and update the test case based on test results and feedback.

A good test case is one that is straightforward and easy to understand, but still comprehensive enough to validate that the system functions correctly against the specified requirements.

Can you explain the differences between ad-hoc and exploratory testing?

Ad-hoc and exploratory testing are both informal methods of testing where the main objective is to discover defects or discrepancies in the software, and they can be seen as similar because they both lack a formal and systematic approach. However, there are distinct differences between the two.

Ad-hoc testing is a totally unstructured testing method where the understanding and insight of the tester is the only factor that drives the testing process. There's no specific test design techniques used, and it relies on the tester's skill, intuition, and experience with the system to determine where and what to test. It's typically performed when there's limited time for proper testing, and it can be useful for identifying issues that may not have been found with structured testing methodologies.

On the other hand, exploratory testing is an approach where the tester actively controls the design of the tests as those tests are performed and uses information gained while testing to design new and better tests. It's about simultaneous learning, test design, and test execution. In this case, the tester takes a journey through the application, exploring it, and at the same time, looking for potential defects.

While both methods are used for uncovering unique errors, exploratory testing is somewhat more systematic compared to ad-hoc testing, as it involves learning about the software, creating test ideas based on that knowledge, and continuously building upon the understanding of the software.

In your opinion, what makes a good test engineer?

A good test engineer requires a blend of technical and soft skills. They need a deep understanding of software development and testing principles, including knowledge of various testing methodologies and techniques. Proficiency in using testing tools is essential, as is the ability to write detailed test cases and understand code, if they're involved in white-box testing or automation.

Curiosity is another critical trait as it drives a tester to explore applications thoroughly and investigate issues deeply. Exceptional attention to detail helps in detecting subtle defects that others may overlook.

Problem-solving is essential because a large part of testing involves identifying problems and determining their root causes. They should also have excellent communication skills to effectively report bugs and articulate test results to other team members.

Time and project management skills are crucial as testers often work under tight deadlines and need to prioritize tasks effectively.

Finally, adaptability is a key going forward considering how rapidly technology is evolving. They should be willing to learn new technologies and testing methods as needed. Above all, an excellent tester is someone who can balance meticulousness and speed, while continuing to learn and adapt in a fast-paced industry.

What is meant by 'end-to-end testing’?

End-to-end testing refers to a software testing method that validates the complete workflow of an application from start to end. This testing method is designed to ensure that the system works cohesively as a whole, including all integrated components and systems, as well as interfaces and databases.

The goal is to simulate real-world scenarios and behaviors, and to ensure that all interconnected systems work together as expected within that user flow. For example, if we consider an online shopping platform, an end-to-end test might include everything from user login, searching for a product, adding a product to the shopping cart, checking out, making a payment, and verifying the confirmation of the order.

It’s carried out after functional testing has been completed, and it helps to identify system dependencies or any issues with the networking, server capacity, and more. It provides a comprehensive view of how well the entire system performs together and aids in ensuring a smooth and seamless user experience.

How do you handle test case dependency?

Test case dependency occurs when the execution of one test case depends on the result of another test case. It's common in sequence-based operations where things need to occur in a specific order.

Handling such dependencies begins with properly mapping out and understanding the dependencies between different test cases. Which tests provide the necessary condition for subsequent tests to be executed, and in what order they should be conducted.

Once the sequence is understood, these dependent test cases are often grouped together to ensure they are executed in the correct order. If a test case fails, the ones dependent on it would either be marked as blocked or would not be executed until the blocking issue is resolved.

Also, automated testing tools which support test management often have features to handle test case dependencies. They can be set up to automatically pause the subsequent tests if a prior dependent test case fails.

However, optimizing your test cases to make them as independent as possible improves the efficiency of your testing process, as each test can be run irrespective of the success or failure of other tests.

What is the difference between a test plan and a test strategy?

A Test Plan and a Test Strategy are different aspects of the testing process, with the former being more granular and the latter being more high-level.

A Test Plan is a detailed document that outlines the scope, approach, resources, and schedule of the intended testing activities. It identifies the items to be tested, the features to be tested, the testing tasks, who will do each task, and the risks and contingencies plan. It's usually specific to a particular project or system.

On the other hand, a Test Strategy lays out the overall approach that will guide the testing process. It's typically a part of the test plan and sets the standards for testing processes throughout the organization or for a series of projects. The strategy document includes general testing principles, test objectives, the types of testing to be performed and the personnel responsible, resource allocations, and the evaluation criteria to be employed.

Essentially, the test strategy paints a big picture of the testing approach and principles, while the test plan provides specific guidelines on how those principles will be applied in practice.

How do you ensure that you are testing the right things in a software application?

Ensuring that I'm testing the right things in a software application starts from having a clear and comprehensive understanding of the software requirements. I thoroughly review the requirement documents, user stories, and use cases and create test cases that align with these requirements. This helps to confirm that the developed feature meets its predefined requirements and performs as expected.

I also prioritize testing based on the risk and impact associated with each component of the application. Some features are more critical than others and warrant more comprehensive testing. This is often defined by a risk-based testing approach.

Involving end-users, or conducting usability testing, is another way to ensure the right things are being tested. Their feedback can offer valuable insights into real-world usage scenarios, corner cases, and can divulge what's most important to the user.

Lastly, maintaining open communication with developers, business analysts, and other stakeholders helps in understanding the system better and ensures that the right areas are being tested effectively. This collaboration fosters a shared understanding of what the software should be and how it's expected to function.

Can you explain the concept of ‘risk-based testing’?

Risk-based testing is an approach where the features and functions to be tested in a software are prioritized based on the risk. The risk is usually determined by two factors - the probability of a feature failing, and the impact it would have if it does fail.

In this approach, we focus our testing efforts on areas of the application that carry the highest risk - that is, areas that are most likely to have defects and that would cause significant damage if they were to fail. We create a risk matrix to identify these areas, assessing each component for the likelihood of failure and the severity of the potential failure.

For instance, a feature that is complex (thus more prone to defects) and critical to the application's operation (thus having a high impact if it fails) would be given high priority during testing.

Risk-based testing is particularly beneficial for guiding testing when time or resources are limited. It aims to find the most serious defects as early as possible, thereby reducing the potential for negative impact.

How do you prioritize which tests to run?

Test prioritization largely depends on the objectives, risk areas, and time constraints of a project.

Starting with identifying the project's critical areas is crucial. These are the features or functionalities that are most important for the users or have a higher probability of failure. Prioritizing these aspects helps in uncovering severe defects that could have a significant impact on the software's functionality.

Another consideration is the risk associated with each component. Risk-based testing can help determine the order of test execution based on potential risk, which is typically a combination of the likelihood of failure and the impact of failure.

Releasing deadlines also play a significant role in prioritizing tests. When under tight deadlines, focusing on the most critical and high-risk functionalities is a pragmatic approach.

Lastly, tests can also be prioritized based on changes made to the application. If a certain module has undergone significant changes, tests related to that area need to be bumped up in priority.

In all cases, it's crucial to maintain strong communication with other stakeholders to make sure prioritization matches the business and user needs.

What do you do when you find a severe defect in the product?

When I encounter a severe defect in the product, the first step is to confirm the defect. I would try to reproduce the bug multiple times to verify its validity and ensure it's not a result of misunderstood requirements or an environment issue.

Once the defect is confirmed, I would document it meticulously. The documentation should include detailed descriptions of the observed issue, the steps taken to reproduce it, test environment details, and any relevant screenshots or logs. The more information the developers have, the easier it will be to diagnose and fix.

Next, it's crucial to communicate the issue promptly using the established bug tracking system to alert the development team. I would also bring it up immediately in any ongoing meetings or standups, especially given the severity of the defect.

Lastly, I'd work closely with the development team to ensure they understand the bug, help verify the fix once it's done, and then conduct a regression test to ensure the fix hasn't inadvertently affected any other part of the software. Severe defects must be dealt with promptly and effectively to maintain the software's integrity.

What are some common problems that can occur during software testing?

There are several common problems that can occur during software testing.

One is lack of clear requirements. If the expected functionality of an application isn't clearly defined, it can be difficult to know what to test for.

Another issue is inadequate time for testing. Often, when project timelines slip, it's the time allocated for testing that gets squeezed, potentially leading to untested features or undetected bugs.

Unavailability of testing environments or testing tools can also pose challenges. If testers don't have the infrastructure they need, it can delay testing processes.

Communication can also be a challenge. If there's not a clear line of communication between testers, developers, and stakeholders, it can lead to misunderstandings and errors.

Lastly, regression bugs are a common problem. These are bugs that were previously resolved and reappear in a new version of the software, which can make it difficult to move forward with development and testing.

Knowing these common problems can help to proactively address them and put solutions in place before they cause large-scale issues.

How would you go about testing a new feature?

Testing a new feature begins with understanding what the feature is expected to do. I would start by gathering as much information as possible, including functional specifications, user stories, and design documents. Conversations with product managers or developers can also provide useful context.

Once I've understood the feature well, I'd develop a detailed test plan. This would include defining what test cases to create, the testing methods to be used, whether automation could be applied, and identifying any dependencies or risks.

Creating the test cases would involve identifying the expected outcomes for specific inputs or actions. I would consider positive, negative, and edge case scenarios to make sure the feature can handle a wide range of inputs and conditions.

The next step is test execution. During this stage, I'd systematically run the test cases, taking note of the outcomes, and logging any defects with detailed information like steps to reproduce, severity, etc.

Once the defects are fixed, re-testing and regression testing are crucial to ensure that the fixes didn’t break anything else and that the feature is working as expected.

Lastly, if possible, I'd involve end-users in the final stages of testing through a process like User Acceptance Testing (UAT). Their perspective can be valuable in catching any usability issues before the feature rollout.

How often do you use automation in your testing processes?

Automation plays a significant role in my testing processes, especially when it comes to repetitive, time-consuming tasks, and regression testing. Given the speed and efficiency of automated tests, they play a vital role in areas like checking functionality after every code change or release.

That said, the extent of automation's use largely depends on the nature of the project, the stage of development, and the type of tests being conducted. For instance, exploratory tests, usability tests, and some complex scenario-based tests may still require manual intervention.

It's important to note that automation is not a replacement for manual testing but rather a complementary tool. The aim is to strike a balance, where automation can save time and reduce human errors in certain areas allowing us as testers to focus on tests that require our unique expertise and judgement.

Can you describe how usability testing is performed?

Usability testing is a technique used to evaluate a product by testing it on intended users. The primary objective is to ensure that the design of a product is intuitive and easy to navigate for the users.

In performing a usability test, you'll first define the aspects of the product you want to evaluate. This could include how easy it is to navigate the user interface, how intuitive the layout is, and how understandable the instructions are.

You then identify representative users or create user personas for your product. They are the ones who will be interacting with your product during the test.

Next, you'll create scenarios for the users to perform. These should be common or critical tasks that end users would undertake on your product.

During the testing itself, the testers observe as users interact with the product, trying to complete the tasks. They observe their actions, expressions, and listen to their verbal feedback. The users may also be asked to think aloud while performing the tasks to gain insights into their thought process.

Once testing concludes, you then analyze the data collected during the sessions, identify any usability issues or areas for improvement, and make changes to the product accordingly. It's very much a user-centered approach that provides valuable insight into the overall user experience.

Get specialized training for your next Testing interview

There is no better source of knowledge and motivation than having a personal mentor. Support your interview preparation with a mentor who has been there and done that. Our mentors are top professionals from the best companies in the world.

Only 5 Spots Left

Discounted rates available those in developing economies. See below for details. I'm a self-taught Senior Product Design Consultant (aka freelancer), ex-Digital Nomad, now I work remotely from warmer climates in the winters. My last contract was with Warner Music, which owns record labels with artists such as Madonna and The …

$220 / month
2 x Calls

Only 1 Spot Left

https://sanzeev.com.np/ Senior Frontend Engineer with over 12 years of experience and currently working at eBay. My core skills are Node.js, JavaScript, Typescript, HTML, CSS, GraphQL and Ionic/Cordova, and I have worked with frameworks such as Backbone, Angular, React and Marko js. I specialize in web app, hybrid mobile app development …

$240 / month
2 x Calls

Only 4 Spots Left

As a senior user researcher with over 15 years of experience running international research projects for global companies such as PlayStation, Spotify, and in the finance industry, I have developed a keen eye for what makes a successful UX researcher. Through my experience as a mentor, I have helped many …

$300 / month
2 x Calls

Only 2 Spots Left

I specialize in helping people build projects, and using the projects as a way to level up their career. Learning software development can be challenging. There's no definitive right or wrong way to learn, but I firmly believe that anyone can learn if they're properly motivated. When you begin work …

$100 / month
2 x Calls

Only 1 Spot Left

I’ve worked as a user experience designer for over 12 years, and am currently UX Director at a FTSE AIM listed company, working in the UK, the US, Australia and South America. I’ve given time as a UX mentor for several years - I take UX mentoring extremely seriously and …

$110 / month
2 x Calls

Only 3 Spots Left

Hey there! 👋🏼 I'm Taylor, a Senior Product Designer with 6+ years of experience, and a passion for helping others grow in their careers. With a background in cognitive psychology and neuroscience, my approach to design is deeply rooted in understanding how people learn and process information—bringing a unique perspective …

$150 / month
2 x Calls

Only 2 Spots Left

I have over 8 years experience with Go, and over 30 years experience programming. I'm the author/maintainer of a couple Go open source projects, and contribute regularly to a number of others. I produce educational Go material on my YouTube channel, Boldly Go, and am the host of the weekly …

$300 / month
2 x Calls

Hola! I'm a Senior Product Designer from UK with 6+yrs experience in the field, providing mentoring services to new and mid-senior designers. I have a passion for teaching. I have taught over 200+ students about UX/UI and product design. I am well-equipped to assist you with various crucial tasks, such …

$50 / month
4 x Calls

Browse all Testing mentors

Still not convinced?
Don’t just take our word for it

We’ve already delivered 1-on-1 mentorship to thousands of students, professionals, managers and executives. Even better, they’ve left an average rating of 4.9 out of 5 for our mentors.

Find a Testing mentor
  • "Naz is an amazing person and a wonderful mentor. She is supportive and knowledgeable with extensive practical experience. Having been a manager at Netflix, she also knows a ton about working with teams at scale. Highly recommended."

  • "Brandon has been supporting me with a software engineering job hunt and has provided amazing value with his industry knowledge, tips unique to my situation and support as I prepared for my interviews and applications."

  • "Sandrina helped me improve as an engineer. Looking back, I took a huge step, beyond my expectations."